Election Petiton: The EC Under Jean Mensa Was Biased to Mahama – Asiedu Nketia

Must Read

See List of Top 10 Po**rn Watching Countries According To Google Research But It’s Surprising How One Country Is Missing

According to a research carried out by PornMD, six out of top 10 countries on the planet that watch...

Pope Skinny Drops Deep Secrets About Ebony’s Death, Attributes It To Lesbobo PLUS More (+Video)

Pope Skinny risks earning the wrath of Ebony's father and her loyal fans after he said on his new...

Lady whose ex-boyfriend demolished the house he built for her, sends clear message to him by posing on the remnants

It is very hard to defeat a strong lady. That is exactly the best caption to give to this...
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Johnson Asiedu Nketia, General Secretary of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), who had been selected by John Mahama as a witness in the election petition case has said to the Supreme Court that Jean Mensa, chairperson of the Electoral Commission (EC) did in fact show bias to Mahama in the just ended elections.

In his witness statement filed on Wednesday, 27 January, he said, “The Chairperson of 1st Respondent and 1st Respondents are also not required under Article 296 of the Constitution to be ‘biased either by resentment, prejudice or personal dislike’ in exercising any discretionary power, but they are required to exercise such powers ‘in accordance with due process of law’.

“The Chairperson of 1st Respondent, Mrs Jean Adukwei Mensa, allowed herself to be biased by her prejudice in favour of the 2nd Respondent, who appointed her in August 2018 and with whose wife Mrs Jean Adukwie Mensa has a close familial relationship. Mrs Mensa was thus , at all material times in the conduct of the her responsibilities, biased by prejudice in favour of the 2nd Respondent and against the Petitioner.”

Mr Asiedu Nketia also highlighted that the 2020 presidential lections recorded more errors by the EC than ever.

“In no previous Presidential Election in the Fourth Republic in Ghana has there been such a catalogue of admitted errors as in what happened after the 7th December 2020 Presidential elections.

“In all previous Presidential Elections, results collated at each constituency collation centre were transmitted directly by fax from 1st Respondent’s regional offices (without collation), to what is usually referred to as the ‘strongroom’ at its head office in Accra, and handed over to the representatives of the candidates, for them to scrutinize and then certify.

“In those previous Presidential Elections, when 1st Respondent declared the final results, they were based on the collated results from the constituencies which were duly certified by representatives of the candidates in the strong room,” the General Secretary Stated.

- Advertisement -

Leave a Reply

Latest News

Dispatch Rider Caught On His Way To Deliver Two Human Heads In Nigeria

A report from Instablog9ja states that a 30-year- old commercial driver, Saka Hassan, who was caught with two human...

More Articles Like This